Ladies and Gentleman, the man that will be in history books. He was throwing the burning tear gas. Not to the cops but away from the children protesting. In his American Shirt and bag of chips. Check his twitter.
HE HAS ALSO STATED NOT TO PURCHASE THE T-SHIRTS THAT ARE BEING SOLD WITH HIS IMAGE BECAUSE HIM NOR THE TOWN OF FERGUSON WILL SEE THAT MONEY!
Just needs to be stated again!
“Not to the cops but away from the children protesting”
"why dont you just give him a chance"
idk because im not physically or mentally attracted to him and ‘but he likes you’ or ‘but hes really nice’ isnt going to change the fact that im not interested
Damn, I don’t think women know how much that really hurts
I think it’s hilarious that so many men think rejection is something that only happens to them and that women can’t possibly know what it’s like to feel unwanted.
“When men imagine a female uprising, they imagine a world in which women rule men as men have ruled women.”
I feel this is very important.
It’s been apparent to me for a while that most men can’t really imagine “equality.” All they can imagine is having the existing power structure inverted.
I cannot decide whether this shows how unimaginative they are, or shows how aware they must be of what they do in order to so deeply fear having it turned on them.
"Most men can’t really imagine “equality.” All they can imagine is having the existing power structure inverted."
#feminist #feminism #women
I’m always amused when women, especially white, cis, straight women, take on this “well, I don’t see how Feminism benefits ME, so fuck it!” mentality.
Because, like, ok, perhaps you have enough privileges that the impact of systematic gender inequality is pretty mitigated for you. Sure.
But, like, do you not give a shit about your sisters? About your sisters of color, and LGBTQIAP+ sisters, and disabled sisters? About your sisters who ARE targets of violence, who are suffering?
Because lists like this only betray 2 things, a) That the person who wrote it does not understand the sociological concepts and theories that lay the foundation for much of feminist theory and b) that they don’t give a shit about anyone less fortunate than themselves in regards to marginalization and oppression.
OP is on some ignorant shit.
how to completely misunderstand and misrepresent feminism, while showing arrogance, ignorance, and complete disdain for those who are suffering: a photo post by someone with no concept of oppression
Also, if you think the patriarchy doesn’t affect you, and that you aren’t a target for violence, be it general or sexual, you might want to sit down, because I have some seriously bad news for you
He’s back! Welcome back, calming cat. You are always welcome here.
Everyone should know of calming cat.
this is the thing that you have to tag because you’ll have to wait 8264589672 years to find it again
sparkygoat asked: I simply ran across your blog and couldn't help but note the interesting critiques you put forth. Hell, if you want to say you changed a persons mind you can mention me, Point is, you've put things in perspective in terms of "female objectivity in the media" My question is do you account for males hormones overriding logic? I mean i have a larger than average feminine aspect to my persona, and when my eyes lock on to a sexually stimulating part of the female, all logic usually goes to the dogs.
My favorite thing is when men perpetuate the idea that men are so mentally fragile that seeing boobs makes them lose their sanity. It really puts the male struggle in perspective.
Do me a favor- keep it in your pants and stay away from other people in case all logic goes to the dogs. If you feel your eyes locking, turn yourself in immediately to the nearest safehouse where someone will be waiting to chain you down in a padded room during your transformation. Don’t worry- they’ll have silver bullets on hand.
Yeah, this is one crazy thing. Remember, it’s generally not feminists who actually think men are uncontrollable inhuman beasts, it’s men trying to justify their own behavior and thoughts.
And yet men conveniently are also the rational gender whenever that argument turns out to be more suiting.
Gotta love how manspaining latches on to directly opposing kinds of logic, depending on the case, whatever suits best to make their perspective more justified.
On one hand men are those primal beasts who just can not fight their sexual urges and lose all sense at the mere sight of boobs.
On the other hand men are apparently way more level-headed than those hormonal and emotional women.
How did this guy’s view get changed by the boobsdontworthatway blog if he thinks that ‘male hormones overriding logic’ is a legit thing?